Monday, October 27, 2008

what more to say on MICROSOFT WELCOMING:WINDOWS 7

actually windows 7 is just a upgraded vista to me!
since i had run vista ultimate in my computer for half a year,i still cann't find any fun stuff in it.!!!
P.S. FROM ME:MICROSOFT,YOU SHOULD WORK MORE HARDER THAN BEFORE,LIKE YOU WORK FROM WINDOWS 98 TO WINDOWS XP!

Microsoft polishes Vista into Windows 7?no way,it is going to be kick by me!


Last week, Apple launched the latest in its series of ads attacking PCs, this time ridiculing Microsoft for spending millions on advertising rather than on "fixing" its Windows Vista operating system.


On Tuesday, Microsoft finally will be able to change the subject.

At the company's Professional Developers Conference in Los Angeles, the company is expected to detail for the first time its successor to Vista, Windows 7.

Rather than a major overhaul, Microsoft is spinning Windows 7 - in the words of CEO Steve Ballmer - as "Windows Vista - a lot better."

In turn, the company expects that the approach will eliminate some of the problems that hampered Vista's premiere almost two years ago and continue to define the operating system's reputation.

When Microsoft introduced Vista in early 2007, the company changed the underlying architecture of the operating system's predecessor - Windows XP - to improve security. That had the unintended consequence of making a number of applications not work well with Vista - an issue that Microsoft says it has since fixed.

PCs designed to run XP also needed much more memory to run Vista. And some Windows XP PCs, heralded as "Vista Capable," could not run premium versions of the operating system.

But Microsoft has promised that there will be much greater compatibility between Vista and the new operating system, which is expected to premiere in early 2010.

"How do you not repeat this with Windows 7? All those architectural changes we made? Not doing that again. All that application investment we did to improve Windows Vista? All appear in Windows 7," said Mike Nash, Microsoft's corporate vice president for Windows Product Management. "So that will be a very big difference in terms of the initial experience with 7 and the initial experience of Vista."

"The applications and devices that work well with Windows Vista should work by and large with Windows 7."

Microsoft has been close-lipped about what exactly the new operating system will bring.

During a conference earlier this month, Ballmer said there would be a "clean-up" in the operating system's user interface, as well as performance improvements.

Nash - who would not specify features ahead of this week's announcement - said that the operating system would embrace new trends, such as the increasing number of applications that are run on the Internet, as well as the growing popularity of laptops.

"As laptops become more the norm, you have to realize laptops are more than just desktops with a battery and a fold up screen. They get used different," he said. "That requires a system to really be able to adapt."

Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates also indicated during a conference last spring that the operating system would support multi-touch technology.

Nash said that on both an architectural level as well as a user interface level, when compared to the difference between XP and Vista, the changes between Vista and Windows 7 represented "more of an enhancement."

"It's not like we're blowing the whole thing up," he said. "But rather looking at what we have there, making sure we can enhance it to make it more compelling."

Neil MacDonald, an analyst at research firm Gartner Inc., said the strategy presents risks.

"Here's the dilemma," he said. "If they do too much, they break applications and they'll have the same problems. If they do too little, it will be treated like Vista bar two."

MacDonald, who described Windows 7 as "more of a finish and polish release than a major release," said that, in addition to some new features, he expects Microsoft to revamp its operating system's user interface.

"They need to visually reinforce that this is not Vista," he said.

Michael Cherry, an analyst at Redmond's Directions on Microsoft, also said it is key that the company move beyond Vista.

"They need to address some of the perception of the problems that are in Vista," he said.

Apple, of course, has been working away at any positive perceptions of the Vista brand that remain.

One of the ads that Apple launched last week suggests that Microsoft no longer wants to use the "Vista" brand.

Nash dismissed the notion.

"What do you call the thing that follows Vista? Trista?" he asked. "It's not intended to minimize or disrespect Windows Vista."

But he acknowledged that it is difficult to change widely held opinions of the operating system.

"The problem is the cognoscenti, the people who are most influential, established their perception of the product back in 2007. Getting them to change their minds is kind of hard," he said.

wow..............................................i will just like to wonder when bill gates got a flight with steve jobs in front of me.
But,before that happens,i would like to buy some popcorns to enjoy that movie!
ANYWAY,FOR HARDWARES I WOULD SUPPORT MICROSOFT AND IN SENSE OF OPERATING SYSTEM I WOULD CHOOSE AN APPLE MAC!

MICROSOFT WITH IT'S NEW VISTA SERVICE PACK 2 BETA EDITION WILL BE BETTER THAN VISTA SERVICE PACK 1?

HEY MY BLOG VIEWER?U YOU EVER WISH MICROSOFT TO REACH THE TOP?
where's the original plan from microsoft?didn't they fill their promises?
You know what would be nice? How about WINFS which was promised in the original plan? I think without it ... Vista is just a dressed up WIN XP.
tell you wad!

I have been using Vista for about six months(half a year!only) now after my former computer died which ran XP Professional. I am now Running Vista Ultimate and would like to see several issues fixed. These are

- Slow start up / boot time

- Fix backward compatibility with older software which ran on XP but not on Vista.

- Add faxing ability (Only available in Vista Ultimate)

- Fix access (speed) issues with solid state drives.

- On my PC there seems to be relentless access to my hard drive (hard drive thrashing). I have tried to determine the cause – some say superfetch and windows search are the cause.

- Lastly on my computer when one is prompted during User Account Control my screen goes blank and the only way to get it back is to turn of the monitor and turn it back on. I have applied all patches (including video drivers) from HP and the problem still exists.


Microsoft is preparing a major update to its Vista operating system. Windows Vista Service Pack 2 will enter beta testing next week, the company has confirmed, with a public release date to follow.

As speculated earlier this week, the new Vista Service Pack 2 will incorporate all fixes released since Service Pack 1, along with a slew of new improvements aimed at increasing support for new hardware and technology standards. The highlights:

* The introduction of Windows Search 4.0, said to speed up searching and deliver better keyword relevancy

* The addition of the Bluetooth 2.1 Feature Pack, which will support emerging Bluetooth technology

* The added ability to record data to Blu-ray discs directly within the operating system

* Improved WiFi setup with changes to Windows Connect Now, Vista's network configuration tool designed to detect and configure wireless devices.

* Better time zone-safe file synchronization with new support for the exFAT file system, which allows for UTC timestamps.

Beta testers in Microsoft's Technology Adoption Program will get the new service pack next Wednesday, October 29. Microsoft says the final release date will be determined based on the feedback received and any changes required during the testing period. The update will eventually be available for both standard Vista configurations and systems running Windows Server 2008.

The news of Vista Service Pack 2 comes in the midst of a busy month for Microsoft. The company is gearing up to reveal its upcoming Windows 7 system at its Professional Developers Conference in Los Angeles next week. Microsoft also rushed out an emergency Windows patch for all Windows 2000, XP, and Server 2003 users on Thursday.




GOOGLE EARTH IN THE IPHONE FROM APPLE.INC WILL SINK WITH STEVE JOBS!



Google Earth now on the iPhone?


DO YOU THINK IT WILL WORKs ?
I DON'T THINK SO!

Google has officially announced the availability of Google Earth to use straight from your iPhone or iPod Touch, and so far reports are that it’s not too shabby. When a good data connection is available the geographical software streams to the device relatively quickly and not only makes use of the phones full display but also it’s functionality.

Multi-touch enables users to zoom in or out of a map with ease and even rotate the map on the screen. A compass in the corner helps keep your bearings. Tilting the iPhone will change the angle of the view to better see the topology of the current terrain, and “My Location” feature will bring the map right to your current location on Earth. Google also of course incorporated their search engine to find information on local businesses and the surrounding area, and built in Panoramio and Wikipedia to get articles and pictures from near your current locale.

The Google Maps for iPhone and iPod Touch is available starting today and best of all, it’s free from the App Store. It’s out in all 18 languages that the iPhone supports and there are rumors for the future that Google Earth could be coming to Android as well in the near future.

via Washington Post

Friday, October 24, 2008

MacBook's History?

Características técnicas del MacBook

Componente MacBook (Principios de 2006) [1] MacBook (Finales de 2006) [2] MacBook (Mediados de 2007) [3] MacBook (Finales de 2007) [4] MacBook (Principios de 2008) [5] MacBook (Finales de 2008) [6]
Pantalla Pantalla de 13,3 pulgadas visibles brillante de 1280x800 pixeles
Gráficos Procesador Gráfico Intel GMA 950 con 64 MB de DDR2 SDRAM compartida con la memoria principal (Hasta 224 MB en Windows con Boot Camp).[1] Procesador Gráfico Intel GMA X3100 con 144MB de memoria compartida DDR2 SDRAM
Disco Duro1 60 GB, 80 GB, 100 GB o 120 GB Serial ATA, 5400 rpm. 60 GB, 80 GB, 120 GB o 160 GB Serial ATA, 5400 rpm. Opcional 200 GB, 4200 rpm. 80 GB, 120 GB o 160 GB Serial ATA, 5400 rpm. Opcional 200 GB, 4200 rpm. 80 GB, 120 GB o 160 GB Serial ATA, 5400 rpm. Opcional 250 GB, 5400 rpm. 120 GB, 160 GB o 250 GB Serial ATA, 5400 rpm.
Procesador 1.83 GHz y 2.0 GHz Intel Core Duo (Yonah) 1.83 GHz y 2.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo (64-bit Merom) 2.0 GHz y 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 2.0 GHz y 2.2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo (Santa Rosa) 2.1 GHz y 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo (Santa Rosa)
Memoria RAM Dos slots, hasta 2 GB[2] DDR2 SDRAM 667 MHz (PC2-5300) Dos slots, hasta 4 GB DDR2 SDRAM 667MHz (PC2-5300)
Airport Extreme Integrado 802.11a/b/g Integrado 802.11a/b/g y n (n desactivado por defecto)² Integrado 802.11a/b/g y n (n activado)
Ranura de carga Unidad Combo³ Graba CD-R a 24x, CD-RW a 10x; lee CD a 24x y DVD a 8x Graba CD-R a 24x, CD-RW a 16x; lee CD a 24x y DVD a 8x
Ranura de carga SuperDrive³ Graba DVD±R y DVD±RW a 4x; CD-R a 24x y CD-RW a 10x; lee DVD±R DL (doble capa) a 4x Graba DVD±R DL a 2.4x, DVD±RW a 4x; CD-R a 24x y CD-RW a 10x; lee DVD±R a 6x. Graba DVD±R DL y DVD±RW a 4x; CD-R a 24x y CD-RW a 10x; Lee DVD±R a 8x. Graba DVD±R DL y DVD±RW a 4x; CD-R a 24x y CD-RW a 10x; lee DVD±R a 8x; DVD-ROM y DVD±R DL a 6x

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

hehe...too bored on my blog?

The password for a screen name on your account was recently reset online. The
date and time of the change are indicated in the subject line of this
message. You don't need to do anything - we just want to notify you for the security
of your account.



Here are some tips for using passwords to limit access to your AOL account
and help keep you safer online.



Changing Passwords
-- Change your screen name's password regularly to help
protect against unwelcome access. Just sign on to AOL with your screen name, go
to Change Password and follow the instructions to create a new password.



Good passwords have a combination of letters and numbers at least six
characters long. Avoid using terms easily associated with you, like your name or
birthday. We suggest you give all screen names in your account a separate password
by repeating these steps for each.



Storing Passwords
-- This enables you to sign on without entering your
password every time. Go to AOL Keyword: MyAOL and click Preferences. Select Passwords
to bring up the Stored Passwords screen. You may want to avoid this feature
if anyone else has access to your computer.



To un-store passwords, return to Preferences and click the Passwords button.
Un-check all of the checked boxes to clear them and delete the asterisks
(****) in the Password box. Afterwards, be sure to change your password at
AOLKeyword: Password.



Important Information for AIM Users:
We've made it easier for you to manage
passwords. For your convenience, when the password for your AOL screen name
was changed, the password for the corresponding AIM account was automatically
changed as well. Whenever you make a change to your password, it will update
both your AOL and AIM accounts. This benefit only applies if the same screen
name is used for both the AOL and AIM accounts
.



We hope you find this information useful. Remember, AOL will never ask for
your password online. Do not give it out to anyone, and change it regularly.



Thanks for using AOL!



The AOL Member Services Team

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

MINI....+electric

Mini: Small, Cute and Electric

BMW Group will showcase a lithium-ion battery powered version of the MINI at next month's Los Angeles Auto Show

http://images.businessweek.com/story/08/370/1021_elec_mini.jpg


In a further sign that full-electric drive vehicles are headed for the mainstream, BMW BMW Group will showcase a lithium-ion battery powered version of the MINI at next month's Los Angeles Auto Show Detroit-Auto-Show-2008 ahead of a pilot project that will see 500 of the cars evaluated on US roads in 2009. Based on the current MINI Hatch, the MINI E will initially appear in two-seater form with rear seats dropped to make way for the battery pack. Rather than an in-hub motor arrangement, an electric motor mounted under the bonnet drives the front wheels through a single-stage helical gearbox derived from the Cooper S, and being all-electric, the full power is delivered from a standing start delivering quite adequate acceleration of 0-62 mph in 8.5 seconds with a top speed electronically-limited to 95 mph.

To conserve energy and help achieve greater range (which is specified at an impressive 150 miles), the MINI E uses a regenerative braking system is directly linked to the accelerator. Release the pedal and the electric motor acts as a generator, feeding the kinetic energy back into the system. Getting used to such a system takes a little time as we learned during our road-test of similar technology found in the Vectrix electric scooter but once you've become accustomed to staying off the brakes it's remarkably easy to utilize it in the majority of driving situations. In the case of the MINI E, BMW estimate that if you can use it in city traffic for around 75 per cent of all deceleration the car's range can be extended by up to 20 percent.

If you do need to hit the anchors, the car's brake system also comes with a newly developed electric pump and the Electrical Power Assisted Steering (EPS) is the same as the one used in mass-produced MINIs.

The lithium-ion storage unit itself is made up of 5,088 cells grouped into 48 modules and packaged into three battery elements. It has a maximum capacity of 35 kilowatt hours (kWh) and transmits energy to the electric motor as direct current at a nominal 380 volts.

Recharging is via a standard power outlet but a high amperage wallbox will be supplied as standard that will speed up the full recharging time to just two-and-a-half hours. The wallbox is designed to be installed in the customers garage, though only lockable garages or similar buildings will qualify. A full recharge draws a maximum of 28 kilowatt hours of electricity from the grid which translates to one kilowatt hour per 5.4 miles and information on how much charge is left in the system is relayed to the driver via a battery level indicator behind the wheel.

Design-wise, the MINI E still looks like a MINI. All of the car's made for the pilot project will share the same dark silver paintwork on the panels and a silver roof incorporating a large yellow power plug logo. The same logo is also emblazoned on the the front and back of the car, the charger port lid (a handy reminder in-case you try to put petrol in), the door-jam and the dashboard trim.

The 500 MINI E's slated for the US trial will be produced at the companys Oxford and Munich sites before being shipped to California, New York and New Jersey for testing by private and corporate customers on a one-year lease. The cars will then be returned to BMW for comparative tests. Because special tools and qualifications are required for servicing the vehicles, MINI will also set up a dedicated service base for customers in each of the states.

So the options appear to be steadily mounting for those looking into the ZEV market, lets just hope that renewable energy fla-bank-meeting-to-focus-on-biofuels Apr-3-2008 infrastructure can keep pace so that we can enjoy truly zero-emissions motoring—with no emissions at the tailpipe or the power plant—sometime in the not too distant future.

MINI E specifications
Number of doors/seats: 3/2
Length/width/height: 146.2/66.3/55.4 inches (3,714/1,683/1,407mm)—unloaded
Wheelbase: 2,467mm (97.1 inches)
Track front/rear: 1,453/1,461mm (57.2/57.5 inches)
Turning circle: 10.7m (35.1 feet)
Kerb weight: 1,465kg (3,230lbs)
Payload: 195kg (430lbs)
Gross vehicle weight rating: 1,660kg (3,656lbs)
Cargo space (DIN): 60 liters

Engine: Electric motor
Output: 150/204 kW/hp
Torque (from idle): 220Nm
Max. rpm (cut off): 12,500 min-1

Battery capacity: 35kWh, approx. 28kWh of which useable
Battery weight: 260kg (573lbs)
Battery charge time: 23.6 hours at 110 V/12 A(1.3 kW) / 4.4 hours at 240 V/32 A (7.0 kW) / 2.9 hours at 240 V/48 A(10.6 kW)
Battery cooling: Air cooling via temperature-, load- and speed-sensitive fans
Peak current: Short bursts of up to 900A

Front wheel suspension: Single-joint MacPherson spring strut axle with anti-dive control
Rear wheel suspension: Longitudinal link with centrally mounted control arms, z axis
Front brakes: 294mm Vented disc
Rear brakes: 259mm Disc
Road stability systems: DSC adapted to modified kerb weight and wheel load (always on), low-friction recuperation control via DSC, ELUP (electronic under pressure pump) brake boost
Steering: Rack and pinion with electronic power steering (EPS)
Type of transmission: Single-stage helical gearbox
Axle load distribution: 750/715 front/rear in kg
Tyres: All-season Runflat 16"

Performance Ratings
Power-to-weight ratio (DIN): 9.76 kg/kW
Acceleration 0100 km/h (0-62 mph): 8.5s
Top speed: 95.0mph
Range (FTP 72): 150miles, 240km
Consumption (FTP 72): 0.19 kWh/mls (0.12 kWh/km)
CO2: nil

i love INTEL!



this is why i love Intel so damn much more than AMD processor!



Intel Demos 'Calpella' Notebook Platform at Its Fall Developer Forum

By Scott Ferguson

wow..i can't belive it

IT'S GOOD TO BUY SOME OLDER STUFF AND YOU SHOULD NOT REGRET THEM!

I HAD BOUGHT A MACBOOK IN JANUARY 2008 BUT NOW, I'AM SO SAD ABOUT IT BECAUSE THE LATER VERSION OF MACBOOK AND MACBOOK PROS HAVING A BETTER PERFORMANCE AND LONGER BATTERY LIFE WHICH SAID BY STEVE JOBS IN HIS PRESENTATION FOR THE LASTEST MACBOOK WHICH IS USING A 2.4GHZ CORE 2 DUO WITH NVIDIA GEFORCE 9400GT !
BUT TODAY I READ A NEWS ON GOOGLENEWS.COM
SAYING THAT!:
it does makes me to be proud of my macbook right now~!!!!



Battery tests: The new MacBook and MacBook Pro

New Mac laptops have battery life shorter than their predecessors

Battery life is a key aspect of a laptop, especially to travelers who don’t have easy access to a power outlet. To test the new MacBook and MacBook Pro for battery life, we performed a battery-drain test by watching a movie clip ripped from a DVD to the laptop’s hard drive. We played the movie at full screen, with the screen brightness set to maximum to simulate the low lighting of an airplane cabin. If the movie finished and the battery still had power, we played the movie again, until the battery drained.

The new 2.4GHz and 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo MacBooks have comparable battery capacities, each lasting a little over 2 hours, 30 minutes. That’s plenty long for most movies, though if you’re watching The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring you might miss the end. However, these results indicate that the new MacBook has about 22 to 24 minutes shorter battery life than the old white plastic 2.1GHz Core 2 Duo MacBook, which finished our test at 2 hours, 57 minutes.

Since the two new Macbook Pro models each have a pair of graphics cards, we ran the battery life test using each one, resulting two battery life scores for each MacBook Pro. At the MacBook unveiling last week, Steve Jobs boasted that with the MacBook Pro’s Nvidia GeForce 9400M graphics card enabled you could achieve up to 5 hours of battery life, and 4 hours with the GeForce 9600M (the same graphics subsystem in the new MacBook). We’re guessing that he didn’t expect users to replicate those times while playing DVDs. Instead, those projected times likely are the results of tests that were not as demanding on the computer, like word-processing or Web browsing.

While watching a movie, you can expect battery life of roughly half of those projected times. Using the 9600M GT graphics card, the 2.53GHz MacBook Pro lasted 2 hours, 12 minutes, while the 2.4GHz MacBook Pro lasted 2 hours, 18 minutes. You’ll barely be able to watch an entire movie in that amount of time. That said, you really don’t need the better performance of the 9600M GT while watching a movie.

Movies run just as smooth on the 9400M, and you’ll get longer battery life. Unfortunately, when using the 9400M, the battery life for either MacBook Pro model did not improve significantly. The 2.53GHz MacBook Pro gained 17 minutes, while the 2.4GHz MacBook Pro lasted 13 minutes longer. Interestingly, the 9400M times between the MacBook Pro models and the MacBooks are similar.

Comparing the MacBook Pro’s 9400M battery life with the previous MacBook Pro, and the older MacBook Pro comes out ahead by 15 percent—the older MacBook Pro’s battery lasted close to 3 hours.

Battery life test results

Battery Life
MacBook Core 2 Duo/2.4GHz (Aluminum, 256MB GeForce 9400M) 2:33
MacBook Core 2 Duo/2GHz (Aluminum, 256MB GeForce 9400M) 2:35
MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo/2.53GHz (Unibody, 512MB GeForce 9600M GT) 2:12
MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo/2.53GHz (Unibody, 256MB GeForce 9400M) 2:29
MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo/2.4GHz (Unibody, 256MB GeForce 9600M GT) 2:18
MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo/2.4GHz (Unibody, 256MB GeForce 9400M) 2:31
MacBook Core 2 Duo/2.1GHz (White, 144MB Intel GMA X3100) 2:57
15-inch MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo/2.4GHz (256MB Nvidia 8600GT) 2:49

Scale = Hours : Minutes. Best time in bold. Reference systems in italics.

We tested each laptop for battery life by playing a movie clip ripped from a DVD and saved to the laptop's hard drive. We started playing the movie with a fully charged battery. The movie played on a continuous loop until the battery drained. The screen was set to full brightness. All systems were running Mac OS X 10.5.5.—MACWORLD LAB TESTING BY CHRIS HOLT

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Because Apple sucks

Well, I’m not buying one for the same reason I don’t buy anything from Apple: None of their stuff works with any of my other stuff. It’s a bunch of proprietary crap that is useless to me. People went nuts over the iPod. Not sure why. I looked into it and, unsurprisingly, it’s not compatible with anything I have. So, I’m not in the iCult and don’t drink the iKool-iAid.

I'am A Mac User!?
But Macs and Windows + Linux Sucks!
I HATE THEM ALL.
but i still fallen in love with Windows XP And my Mac OS X Leopard!

IF!

!f you are a creative designer (graphics, music) you better choose mac
If you are an IT developper use XP or VISTA
If you are an alternatieve IT'er and like the open source use linux
If you like the newest games, use VISTA (sp1)
...

Every OS has his pro's and con's, you just have to know what you want to do with it, even if you want it all, get them all and virtualize your computer

Mac vs Windows n others!(linuxxx)

I made this blog to discuss one of the things that im passionate about and that is technology I'm a tech geek and im always a sucker for a new gadget. One of the things I have ran across over the years though is the biggest debate online is Mac vs Windows vs Linux mostly mac and windows the question is always who is better, What operating system works it could cause a debate in a room full of geeks. Think about this what if Mac + Windows+ Linux was running for President of the United States who would you vote for? This may sound like a stupid question to you but I want to know what you think? First off I want everyone to know that I have no background on Mac Os and im fairly new with Linux so these are just my views as a windows power user. I have had Windows 1999 Windows Xp and The disaster Windows Vista. So I cannot tell you what Os is the best between all 3 or what system is better but what I can say is that windows from what iv seen and heard is a lot easer to run then mac or linux correct me if Im wrong, I have just bought a linux running notebook and im so frustrated it feels like im upgrading to windows vista dont get me wrong im not a linux or vista hater im just frustrated with the both. First off linux seems as if it can run programs I just am not sure how to put them on like for example Java ive downloaded all the different java versions for linux threw firefox and for some reason they dont just load up and work. Anyway im getting off track I guess what im interested in knowing is what you yourself would rather run and why? I don't really want to hear windows sucks or linux is dumb as that does not justify anything for me. Tell me what you think!

More holes than a Leopard! Yep, Mac sucks!

This is soon going to be coined as one of the worst security downgrades for Mac OSes in History. Mac's Leopard. Guess what, it's not only bad and in many ways irrelevant, it's also insecure and oh, did I say it has more holes than a leopard has spots?

Yeah, there has not been any serious security reviews of Mac's because .. well, no body takes them seriously ANYWAY! they're really pretty shiny toys. "Fashion Icons" if you may. But a serious computer? Well, maybe.. Personally I know it does the job. But are you going to be "Safe" doing it?

Leopard's firewall is a mess, say researchers, shutting off by default and allowing connections even under "block all."

That's what one researcher claimed after test driving the firewall feature. Guess what, it has more holes than Swiss cheese. It has more holes than the entire army in Iraq, it even has more holes than the number of a$$ holes in Amman University, AND Abdoun COMBINED! Wow! That's a lot of holes!

Even the stupid folks at Microsoft managed to figure out that you MUST have your firewall ON when installing! Leopard keeps you completely exposed! Brrrr, It's cold .. you might catch a virus or a worm through one of them holes! Or it might be that the arrogant folks at Apple thought that "Hey, this is a mac, we don't have viruses or worms"... Yeah It's True!

So you had OsX and you're happily upgrading to the new and improved Leopard, you had firewall on and upgrade ... do you think you still have the firewall on? Naaa! It's GONE, yep, NO MORE! What a joke!

Finally, you decide to go ahead and manually turn on the firewall, only to be surprised that it's APPLICATION ONLY! Doh! I want to open port 53 I don't care which application uses that, just open the goddamn port dummy! Leopard: Huh?. Oh, poor mac users have no way of configuring that!

I feel sorry for you people! I really do! Paying all that money expecting to get something to brag about. Like you paid for the iPhone only to be hacked and wormed and ridiculed for it! So sad really!

Wanna know more? Go Ahead!

Sense...





Tort reform is a perennial issue, especially around election time, when the very words seem to evoke responsible government and good stewardship. Common Sense Foundation says that North Carolina should reject tort reform. It limits citizens' basic rights, and it's simply bad policy pushed by powerful special interests, from insurance companies to tobacco companies to right-wing think tanks.Instead, North Carolina should address the real and complicated reasons for rising insurance and medical costs: inflation in the costs of prescription drugs, skyrocketing administrative costs, and private, for-profit insurance and medical facilities.

Saturday, October 11, 2008


What will happen next?

What will happen next?

My prognosis is that Microsoft will use smoke and mirrors to conjure up an early release of Windows 7, the next edition of the world’s most widely-used operating system. Then they will quietly and unofficially allow IT departments to migrate straight from Windows XP to Windows 7.

Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates has already alluded to this and IT departments have certainly welcomed that idea, since most of them have found very few reasons to migrate to Vista — although my colleague John Sheesley recently argued the devil’s advocate position for IT departments to adopt Vista.

To be clear, I am not predicting that Microsoft will do a quick-and-massive overhaul of Windows Vista in the next 12 months. Instead, I think we’ll see Microsoft do the following:

  • Strip out or minimize some of Windows Vista’s clunkiest features — especially User Account Control
  • Simplify the interface back to something closer to Windows XP
  • Reduce backward compatibility in order to streamline the code base
  • Work much harder with vendors to ensure driver and software compatibility with new hardware and applications
  • Reduce the cost of Windows in retail boxes in order to generate goodwill and undercut Mac OS X (meanwhile, this will have little effect on the price of enterprise licensing, which is already much cheaper than retail)
  • Learn from the long delay of Windows Vista and move to an incremental release model with a subscription and at least one major update per year. Financially, most IT departments are already on a subscription plan. Now look for Microsoft to move consumers in this direction.
  • Release Windows 7 by the end of 2009 and market it as the simplest and easiest Windows ever

This will be Windows Vista Service Pack 2 but with a new Windows name, a new marketing campaign, and a new release model. Naturally, Microsoft won’t fool many IT departments or hard core techies with this type of move, but it doesn’t have to.

If Microsoft does it right, this will create a general sense that it “fixed” Windows and will create an OS that is more modular and more versatile so that it can thrive on more types of devices, from things like the Eee PC and the HP 2133 Mini-Note to high-end laptops and desktops.

If you want evidence to support this theory, look no further than the circumstances that created and led to the evolution of Windows XP, which currently dominates about 80% of computers.

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Leopard vs. Vista

Apple's new operating system was launched on Oct 26, and in its first weekend, the company says it sold two million copies. A lot of people are now asking if they should ditch their PC for a new Mac. So is Leopard really better than Vista, and how?

Digital Journal -- Apple's newest operating system, Mac OS X Leopard, boasts 300 new features, a sleek design and a price point that seems almost too good to be true ($129).

Apple has earned quite a bit of media attention around the launch of the OS, thanks in part to strong brand recognition on the heels of strong iPod and computer sales.

And with Leopard, we're seeing a market where consumers who would traditionally not care about Mac, actually consider crossing over to the side with the big cat.

And why not? With a price point that is aggressive and approachable compared to Windows Vista, more features than you can shake an iPod at, and incredible function and ease of use, Leopard is becoming the new king of the jungle.

In this episode of Digital Journal TV, we break down the top features of Leopard and give you our top five reasons why Apple's newest OS is better than Windows Vista.

Because of everything...

You're the first thing I think of
Each morning when I rise
You're the last thing I think of
When I close my eyes

You're in each thought I have
And every breath I take
My feelings are growing stronger
With every move you make

You're an angel from above
who takes away my pain
My love for you is so strong
It's always just the same

You're the miracle in my life
Who can always make me smile
Just knowing that you care
Makes my life worth-while

You've touched my heart and soul
Which you have from the start
Your warm soft words
Will never leave my heart

You are everything I want
You're so pure and true
I love you with everything I have
And I love everything that you do.

I wanted to love you,
But I was just too scared.
Haunted by the past,
That always seemed to reappear.

I tried my best to run and hide,
But I just couldn't get you off my mind.
Should I give love a second chance?
Or am I just wasting my time?

You promised you were different,
But so did the rest.
Then you looked into my eyes,
And I knew you had passed the test.

So I took a chance,
and fell deeply in love.
Maybe this is what I've been looking for,
That special kind of love from above.

God, how can this be true?
Everything is happening so fast.
But something keeps telling me,
I've found true love at last.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Why I Race

Compito con para los que no puedan competir con

Quién no puede estar parado

Quién no puede ejecutarse.

Compito con para esos who've ensamblé la lucha

Enfermedad o no,

Hemos visto la luz.

Compito con para ellos porque puedo

Porque debo

Y no para la diversión.

Compito con para cada mujer y hombre

Para las familias

Porque correcto.

Compito con.

Para no perder,

Pero de modo que otros pudieran ganar.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

More OS X security FUD

We’ve heard it about a hundred times now: OS X is becoming more and more virus ridden. Various media sources would have you believe the Mac is more worm-infested than your average scoop of topsoil. This time, the attack comes from the Associated Press (who are secure in the knowledge that nobody’s writing viruses for their IBM compatibles). While many of the claims in the article are true (the mention, for example of the exploits Tom Ferris found), others are time-worn patented mongers on fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Take this old chestnut:
The Mac’s vulnerability could also increase as Apple transitions to a product line that uses microprocessors made by Intel Corp., security experts said.

With new Macs running the same processor that powers Windows-based machines, far more people will know how to exploit weaknesses in Apple machines than in the past, when they ran on the PowerPC chips made by IBM Corp. and Motorola Corp. spinoff Freescale Semiconductor Inc.

Every time I hear this supposition, I’m left speechless by the sheer ignorance of the piece’s author. I can see how this might make logical sense to a layperson, but all it takes is talking to someone who knows anything at all about technology to know that this is hogwash. Hogwash, I say.

The bottom line, as always, is this: no, the Mac is not immune to security breaches. There has yet to be a widespread exploited vulnerability, but sooner or later, yes, there probably will be one. But your best protection still remains the same: use your common sense. Don’t open suspicious attachments, or click on iffy-looking links—this is the computer equivalent of not walking through a dangerous neighborhood late at night.